Top Five Lies Told About Christianity in Political Discourse
avatar

North Korea, a communist country, has up to 70,000 Christians locked away in concentration camps. They are in those camps simply because they are Christian. Christianity has always been the greatest threat to socialist tyranny. Despite the prevalence of Christianity in America, we Christians are losing ground against this tyranny. Many of today’s political activists and politicians are decidedly as Marxist as Kim Jong Un is. What they either don’t know or won’t tell you is that the ultimate cost of their socialist vision is misery heaped on the backs of most of humanity who are living under such governments. The most oppressed of these are most often Christians, as is the case in North Korea, because Judeo-Christian government looks like what the American founders set up for our country. That is, it’s about freedom. The ignorant, the brainwashed, and yes some truly evil people, will spread all sorts of lies about Christians in order to “justify” marginalizing them. This marginalization, taken to its final extreme, is seen in North Korea today. I’ve decided to put together a list of the Top Five Lies Told About Christianity in Political Discourse here in America. I solicited responses on my Facebook page and this is what my friends and I came up with.

Josh May

1. From Josh May: Lie – “We’re anti-science and refuse to believe in things like evolution, the big bang, the solar-centric model of the solar system, etc.”

They have some traction with this because Christians are not universally science-loving people…just as atheists are not universally science-loving people. I’m not a big science buff, but I understand the scientific method. It was invented by the Catholic Church. You will find some key roots of science in Christianity. Christians believe that all of nature is subject to God. God can do whatever He likes with nature. He is supernatural. Catholics and protestants differ in their views on some scientific questions. Some protestants agree with the Catholic Church on evolution. Others do not. The Catholic view of evolution is that there can be development within a species, but that no species can turn into another species. The Galileo controversy damaged the reputation of the Catholic Church but for the wrong reason. As for the origin of the universe, Catholics and all Christians believe that God created the universe out of nothing. Belief in this does not in any way contradict science despite the claims of those who would like to believe otherwise. Certainly, many scientists disagree with Christians, but also certainly, many scientists will tell you that nothing in known science refutes the claim of Christians on creation.

Again, it is unfortunately true that there are some ignorant people in the world who are also Christians, just as there are ignorant atheists. Salvation is for all people, ignorant or otherwise. If a few Christians make claims about science that are over the top, it does not mean that “Christianity is anti-science” any more than the existence of some ignorant atheists means that atheism is anti-science. A real scientist will investigate to see what Christianity actually teaches about these things, pose a hypothesis about it and then offer evidence. It is quite unscientific, not to mention false and hypocritical, to make blanket claims that “Christianity is anti-science” just because you hate Christianity.

See Adam, Eve and Evolution.

Jennifer Mauney

2. From Jennifer Mauney:  Lie – “That we are anti-women – both because of the abortion issue and women staying at home with their kids.”

And from Leticia Velasquez: Lie – “We are waging a war on women by denying them the right to abort their babies and contracept thus achieving equality with men.”

Leticia Velasquez with her daughter who was born with Down Syndrome.

Ah yes. Well, if you believe that women’s bodies are inherently flawed because they have uteruses and that this is because of a “mistake” or “fluke” of evolution that has to be “fixed” using “science,” or some such thing, you might get the idea that Christian views on the family are denying women their “equality” with men. Who knows where you get the idea that women have to be like men in order to be “equal” to them? I’ve never been able to figure that one out. The fact is that there are countless women who embrace Christian teaching that all people are equal in dignity, no matter their gender, because our dignity comes from the fact that we are created by a loving God and in His image. Christians believe that men and women have different roles even though they are equal in dignity. Father Z, for example, would make an absolutely HORRIBLE nun, but as a priest, he is quite awesome. In like manner, I cannot be a father to my children…because I’m not a man. These roles are generally based on the fact that we were created by God to have different bodies — not to mention different gifts and strengths and weaknesses — which are suitable for different things. To deny those things about ourselves is to deny the purpose for which God made us. You might say, in fact, that our views are more science-based than yours are because we see our bodies and how they are made and we utilize them in accordance with that. (See #1 claim above.)

 

David Adams, a fellow Kentuckian.

3. From David Adams: Lie – “Jesus was a socialist so Christians who aren’t socialists aren’t following Christ.”

How many times do we hear this one every day? I lose count. Jesus was not a socialist any more than he was a conservative. Jesus was/is God. God trumps all that stuff because, you know, He’s God.

I like what Bishop Moronta had to say to his flock in Venezuela. Considering that this is the country led by the communist dictator Hugo Chávez, I think it was very brave of him.

When somebody claims something about the person of Jesus,” Bishop Moronta added, “the attitude of believers in Christ must be that which is inspired by the Gospel: a profession of faith, made without hesitation and without fear, not to condemn another, but to invite him to understand what the true meaning of the existence of the person and work of Jesus the Lord is.”

“Therefore, neither a revolutionary, nor a Socialist, nor a hippie, nor a philosopher, nor a Gnostic deity, nor an alien, nor a ghost, nor a myth: Jesus is Lord, the Son of the living God, the Savior, the Word incarnate who has made the mystery and plan of God known to us, the Beginning and the End, the faithful witness, the same today, yesterday and forever,” Bishop Moronta emphasized.

Because Jesus is God. You know? I would posit that the more a socialist grows in his love for Jesus, the less socialist and the more Christian he will be.

Carol’s profile picture.

4. From Carol Wiggins Malone: Lie – “That we are pathetic because we cling to our guns and our religion? I forget the whole quote but you know what I mean.”

Yes, you’re thinking of a quote that is from Barack Obama himself, and it goes just like this:

You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.

And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

The claim is that people who cling to religion are doing so out of bitterness against the world that we feel has let us down. This is precisely the opposite of what Christianity is. In order to feel that the world has let you down, you have to start with an expectation that the world has something to offer you. Christianity is about understanding that the world is an inherently fallen place that is in need of redemption, and so our hope is not in the world. Our hope is in God. Bitterness also indicates animosity toward the things of the world. This, too, is a false claim about Christianity. We believe in the redemption of the world and we seek to tell people about that redemption so that they, too, can have hope in God. Barack Obama’s claim is completely the opposite of who we really are as Christians. If the claim is that we are violent (guns) or that we are racist, then the claim is even more ignorant. You may not understand the right to self defense or how enjoyable it is to shoot targets and wild game, but this is no reason to claim our intentions are bad. And when people say that they are for enforcing immigration laws, it is not at all reason to claim their intentions are racist. If you ask me, the president was advancing a false conspiracy theory about Christians for political gain. That’s not very Christian of him, is it?

Jason Allred

5. From Jason Allred: Lie – “Separation of Church and State is a tenet of the Constitution.”

That one makes me groan every time. I’m not sure why this myth is so widespread but we hear it ad nauseum. For instance, when I mention that the government should not be forcing the Catholic Church to pay for contraception through her insitutions, I hear, “What about separation of church and state?” The reality is that the HHS mandate violates what “separation of church and state” actually is about, and further, the phrase “separation of church and state” is nowhere in the Constitution. The term actually comes from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists who were concerned that a state religion might be established. Historian David Barton lays out the background for the exchange of letters between the Danbury Baptists and Thomas Jefferson. (Click here for that.) It would not be Constitutional for the government to establish Catholicism as the state religion, thereby forcing Mormons, Baptists and Methodists (and everyone else) to reject their faith (or lack of it) and worship in the Catholic Church. That “wall” preventing such a thing is the only “wall” Jefferson was referring to. To suggest that “separation of church and state” means that Christians may not lobby for government to have laws reflecting Christian values is preposterous. America is a republic, not a democracy, but even a “democrat” should know better than to claim that a Christian view should not be considered in law just because it is Christian in nature. Not only is the idea that Christianity cannot be reflected in our laws a notion that is opposed to the Constitution, it is also opposed to the “democratic values” that Democrats claim to hold dear. Shockingly, Democrats like Maxine Waters and others routinely advocate for government to allow the imposition of Sharia Law, the Islamic legal system that is decidedly in direct contradiction to the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, while out of the other side of their mouths they will claim that Christianity should remain only within the walls of the churches. It’s hypocrisy.

By and large, claims against Christianity launched by the Left in America seem to be based on the very bitterness and antipathy that the president claimed is held by people of faith. This bitterness and antipathy comes from ignorance about what Christianity is.

I have been involved in online debates for many years. When I first came online, Bill Clinton, a Democrat, was president. I spent my time online in apologetics forums, debating with non-Catholics about whose church is the true Church. I remember how intense these online debates were, but they were never hostile. No one ever got ugly. No one ever threatened anyone. No one ever exhibited hatred of individuals who simply disagreed with each other. Despite our differences of opinion, which were deep and wide many times, we still loved each other and treated each other with respect. Never would any of us have imagined that we would all be on the same team in such a short amount of time, facing the greatest threat to religious freedom America has ever known. It used to bother me when someone said he was a Methodist, or a Mormon, or a Baptist, but the Left in America has united so strongly against Christianity in all its “flavors” that we have become one in our stand against them. I am grateful to know that Christians share this love for each other in the face of this great trial, but I do so long for the days, even under a Democratic president who I disliked, when we were free to boldly debate our ideas with each other without any fear whatsoever that we might lose our freedom.

America has not merely been transformed. America is dead everywhere but in the hearts of people of faith. It is time for resurrection.

My Goodness, This Sounds Very Familiar
avatar

Something’s going on. See here and here.

Zilla writes:

After that, I removed “Patrick” from my blogroll and pretty much forgot about him, and he apparently did shut down his blog, only to resurface later – which I would learn is a serial thing with him wherein he has a blog, causes a lot of trouble, wonders why nobody likes him, blames everybody for what he did, closes the blog, opens a new one, attacks people, blames everybody for what he did, wonders why nobody reads or links to  him, closes the blog and then opens a new one again. Lather. Rinse. Repeat. He also resurfaces with different usernames that are typically variations on whatever names he has used before, as you will see.

My, but doesn’t that sound familiar? Except for the part about changing names, that sounds a lot like me. I have Bipolar Disorder. I have closed websites and blogs multiple times and started new ones. I’ll bet most of you don’t know I used to do this. Yea, I should probably update that.

What’s going on is that people in the conservative blogosphere appear very willing to run to the aid of other bloggers when they are in need of assistance. Those of us who are on fire in our brains could use some help, too, but you can’t give us the kind of help we need. It can really hurt to see everyone running to everyone else’s aid when you desperately need help and no one can/will help you. I’m not the kind to blow up like this blogger apparently has, but I have blown up at people. I can’t apologize for it, either, because it would be scrupulosity. I’m sorry for the pain, but it’s really not my fault. If I blame myself for something I have no control over, my illness will only intensify.

Zilla writes (emphasis mine):

Then, last week, “Patrick” repeatedly attacked my friend, Robert Stacy McCain, and the attacks were picked up by other bloggers and that caused more attacks against Stacy from elsewhere, turning into a whole big mess, but Stacy was still very kind towards “Patrick” and generously linked to him more than a few times which resulted in “Patrick” getting what was probably the best traffic he’s ever had, and yet, he continued to attack Stacy.

See? This is what I mean when I say that Stacy is a Christian. As for this person continuing to attack Stacy, well…if he has Bipolar Disorder it means he’s on a spiral and it’s very likely not his fault. The best thing that anyone can do is to do what Stacy did and either be kind to him or ignore him. But in some cases of those who interact with him regularly (maybe only a few cases) ignoring him is going to hurt him. I know because it hurts me when people do that. It’s not your fault unless you are someone who is a friend of his who he relies on regularly for some kind of support. If someone like that suddenly starts treating him like dirt, or suddenly cuts him off, that would be very unkind. Whatever you do, please don’t be mean to him.

If he has done something illegal, like issuing a death threat, you should report him so that he can get the help he needs.

I want to apologize right now if I have this gentleman pegged wrong. I am just trying to be helpful. I acknowledge that I could be completely wrong about all of this, but I have seen it before in myself, and I recognize it as being similar to things I have done and I know that I’ve had no control over it whatsoever. When it was not handled correctly by others close to me, I ended up suicidal in the crisis unit. Please proceed with caution. And please pray about all of this, and especially for him. Thanks.

Obama’s Mini-Unions
avatar

The Obama Administration’s regulations on private businesses have reached the point of insanity. Look at this chart at National Review Online.

Onerous regulations erupt from Washington like flaming rocks from a volcano. The National Labor Relations Board regularly coughs up such projectiles. As attorney William J. Kilbert explained in the July 12 Wall Street Journal, the NLRB last September authorized “micro” bargaining units among larger workforces within union shops. An NLRB judge, for instance, recently certified a mini-union that represents the women’s shoes departments on the third and fifth floors of Bergdorf Goodman’s New York City store. Imagine such a retail manager negotiating wages and benefits, not with his entire staff, but with various floors and even departments under his roof.

A mini-union? Representing the women’s shoes departments? On two floors of a store? It’s no wonder the economy is in the shape it’s in.

Read the whole thing.

Follow My Priest Friends on Twitter
avatar

Here are my priest friends on Twitter. I hope I don’t forget anyone. Please follow them all. I follow many priests on Twitter, but these are the ones who actually are active on Twitter and who talk to me on Twitter sometimes, so they get a special shout-out.





UPDATE: Follow Karen Santorum, too! She just started Twitter.

Fr. Longenecker, Stuart James, Demonic Possession, Mental Illness and the Colorado Shooting
avatar

Stuart has taken issue with Fr. Dwight Longenecker. Stuart says that Fr. Longenecker is “conflating evil and demonic possession with mental illness.” I tend to disagree with the word “conflating” in the sense that I don’t think that was Fr. Longenecker’s intent at all. Also, I don’t think most people will understand what Stuart means by “conflating”….but I do…because like him, I live with Bipolar Disorder and I see this through the eyes of someone who deals with it on a daily basis.

I think Fr. Longenecker was trying to be fairly clear that he separates the two…but he mussed it up.

Stuart writes:

Given this, my main contention with the ‘demonic possession’ theory would be the degree of culpability. How much blame and responsibility can be attributed to the man, and how much to the demon? We don’t tend to observe criticism of the man from Gadarenes, ‘Legion’; in fact, quite the opposite, he’s viewed with sympathy as an unfortunate victim.

We have no capacity to blame. Only God can rightly judge. We use our best judgment as to the danger someone may pose to society and we act to protect society from people who might be aggressive. There isn’t anyone who knows the culpability of any other person on anything. We can only make guesses about that, and if society itself has become barbaric, society is even less able to judge than it would be if it were a moral society. Having said that, Stuart is right that we must be very careful not to cast aggressors as victims unless we are reasonably sure that the person was definitely under the influence of something he had no control over. Still, that point is rather a side issue in all this.

Fr. Longenecker writes:

The human person is an intricate organism in which the physical, mental and spiritual aspects are totally interwoven. Therefore, in most cases, trying to diagnose the possibility of demonic influence is extremely difficult.

To this, Stuart responds:

The use of the term ‘diagnose’ is interesting as this would usually have medical connotations, and I suspect Longenecker has this in the back of his mind; especially in relation to mental illness.

I’ll give Fr. Longenecker leeway on that since even my mechanic uses the word “diagnose” in reference to analyzing what’s wrong with my car. I think the fact that Stuart isn’t giving him that leeway may explain, at least in part, why he reacted so strongly to what Fr. Longenecker wrote. This is not to say that Stuart isn’t justified in being disturbed by the article.

Fr. Longenecker wrote:

The obsession with evil will probably have an addictive element. The personality begins to change. The individual may seem “normal” most of the time, but he’ll have “dark moments” when his “inner demons” take over. The difficulty in diagnosing demonic influence is that these same symptoms may indicate substance abuse problems, mental illness, social maladjustment, emotional inadequacy, relationship problems or a complex web of such difficulties. Demonic influence will cause these symptoms, but these symptoms are not necessarily a sign of demonic activity.

I would say that “obsession with evil” is a bad choice of words. “Obsession with evil” would not be appropriate to describe demonic possession because “obsession with evil” means that one either does not or cannot stop “thinking” about evil. The “thinking” part of that means that in “obsession” we are not referring at all to demon possession but rather to something happening within the realm of someone’s own thinking. “Possession” refers to another entity and that entity’s thoughts are separate from the thoughts of the possessed person. “Obsession” refers to the actual thoughts of the obsessed person.

“Inner demons” is also a bad choice of words on Fr. Longenecker’s part. It causes blurring of the lines between mental disorder and actual demonic possession. I am glad that he put it in quotes, but he should not have used the term at all. I agree with him that some symptoms of mental disorder may look like demonic possession, and vice versa, but the use of the term “inner demons” impedes people in coming to a full understanding of the ABSOLUTE difference between mental illness and demonic possession.

Stuart responded this way:

Here we have the paragraph start with “The obsession with evil” and then move to an explanation of the difficulties of ‘diagnosing’ possession; as this same symptom may indicate mental illness, or even emotional inadequacy.

This, to me, is a blatant conflation of evil with mental illness, or personality disorder.

I don’t personally see it as “blatant conflation.” Rather, I see it as I stated, an unfortunate use of terms that can cause a blurring of the lines. I don’t think Fr. Longenecker meant to blur the lines, but I believe he did. It seems “blatant” to Stuart because he deals, as I do, with mental illness on a daily basis, and with the stigma that comes with it. Of course it seems blatant to him…because it hurts us when we see things like this. They jump out at us. In this particular case, I see what Fr. Longenecker is trying to say but if I had read it without reading Stuart’s article first, I might have actually freaked out and gotten upset about it, too. Isn’t that ironic?

We have dignity, and when people talk in terms that tend to suggest the opposite of the truths we hold most dear in our hearts on a daily basis in order to SURVIVE….well, it’s like we’re on fire and trying to stay alive and you’re pouring a few drops of petrol on us. You may not see any harm whatsoever, but a little falsehood about what we go through….especially from faithful Catholics….can sometimes be enough to send us over the edge. I’m not talking about Stuart here. I’m talking about me…and I know Stuart understands what I’m saying because he has Bipolar Disorder, too, and he has seen that happen to me.

Fr. Longenecker wrote:

When the signs of preternatural strength are seen, horrible alien voices come from the person, vile blasphemies are heard and perverted and violent actions are witnessed, one can be fairly sure that a demonic infestation is happening. However, many of these symptoms may also be signs of a deep mental or spiritual illness which is not demonic in origin.

Stuart responds:

So, preternatural strength, horrible alien voices and vile blasphemies may be symptoms of mental illness? Well, would they not be signs of demon possession rather than mental illness? And why would someone suffering from mental illness have supernatural strength? I’ve never read of such a thing.

I’ll have to agree with Stuart on that one, except with the “vile blasphemies.” I do think “vile blasphemies” might come out of a mentally ill person’s mouth, even a Christian person with mental illness if the illness is bad enough. I myself blurt absolute nonsense out of my mouth sometimes, though not blasphemies. My kids still have not gotten used to that. But supernatural strength and horrible alien voices? No. Mental illness doesn’t cause those kinds of serious and sudden changes in physical capacity.

Fr. Longenecker writes:

Yes. Something happened to the mild mannered science geek. He turned into a monster. Something twisted in his mind and heart, and Evil made an entry. Evil infested his life. It took him over. Whether the twist was through mental illness, some inner wound or some terrible dark intelligence, we cannot say.

Hmmm.

Stuart writes:

Again, we see the monster portrayed, fully beset and overwhelmed with evil, and what may have been one of the causes? Yep, I think you’ve already guessed….mental illness.

Feel free to believe in demonology, or not. Hey, feel free to believe in mental illness, or not. But if you believe in them both, PLEASE STOP conflating the two.

Mental illness DOES NOT equate evil.

I’m going to have to side with Stuart on this one, wholeheartedly, mainly because I don’t ever see glowing posts in the Catholic blogosphere about how the mentally ill are actually the image of God in the world. If we were talked about as what we really are, instead of being talked about only when someone commits mass murder, I might see some more value in Fr. Longenecker’s post. As it stands, I’m going with Stuart on this one. I would acknowledge that Stuart seems to those who do not live with this disorder that he overreacted. Having said that, I know why he overreacted. It’s because he’s sick of this stuff, and frankly, so am I.

Jesus is our salvation, no matter how messed up our brains might be. All the trials bring us closer to Him. It’s Jesus’ picture I keep in my worn-through shoes, not Fr. Longenecker’s. :-) God bless you both.

Bipolar Disorder’s Positive Aspects?
avatar

Stuart tweeted this article to me regarding Bipolar Disorder’s “up-side.”

Dr. Fiona Lobban, who led the study, said: “Bipolar Disorder is generally seen as a severe and enduring mental illness with serious negative consequences for the people with this diagnosis and their friends and family. For some people this is very much the case. Research shows that long-term unemployment rates are high, relationships are marred by high levels of burden on family and friends and quality of life is often poor.

High rates of drug and alcohol misuse are reported for people with this diagnosis and suicide rates are twenty times that of the general population. However, despite all these factors researchers and clinicians are aware that some aspects of bipolar experiences are also highly valued by some people. We wanted to find out what these positive experiences were.”

Oh yes. You probably can’t hold down a job, be married (unless your spouse is a saint), or have any friends. You’ll possibly be driven to abuse drugs and alcohol and there’s a “decent” chance you’ll kill yourself, but other than that, it’s pretty cool?

Nah, I don’t think so.

Well, fine. I’ll play along. There is that part about having a very high I.Q. I hear about “enhanced creativity” but I don’t recognize that in myself, really, I guess because I don’t really see other people as being “not creative.” The article lists a few positives, most of which I don’t really experience.

I’m certainly not going to complain, though. This is the Cross and that is what I am grateful for. The only real positive aspect is that I can, in this way, participate in the redemption. And that is everything.

Review: Kimjongilia
avatar

Have you been thinking that communism might be a good solution to end societal ills? Before you start hanging up posters of Lenin, Mao or Che in your house, you should watch Kimjongilia (2009), a stunning documentary containing testimonies of North Koreans who fled the starvation and oppression of “Dear Leader” Kim Jong Il. Though the film falls short of being epic, it is a must see for anyone who is unfamiliar with the depth of suffering North Koreans must endure if they do not fall in lock step with the regime’s will on even the most trivial areas of life. Michael Gordon’s soundtrack along with inspiring dance scenes, gripping animation, and some remarkable footage from within North Korea greatly enhance the deep emotional impact of the film.

Kimjongilia brings to life the eyewitness accounts of six refugees from North Korea with descriptions of life in concentration camps, the privileged status of the elite who worship their leader as a god, and the oppression of artists, religion and all other thought that is not in keeping with the will of the regime. I was most struck by the genuine love these refugees share for their fellow countrymen who are left behind. Christian missionaries who assist those who flee are given credit for their very difficult and dangerous work in ensuring that the path to freedom is as open as possible for those seeking the route to freedom, primarily through China.

Many, including myself, have hoped that with the passing of Kim Jong Il, there might be an opportunity for the light of freedom to shine in North Korea. Very little is known about the current dictator, Kim Jong Un, son of Kim Jong Il. This hope in me has waned after watching Kimjongilia and seeing how brainwashed North Koreans truly are by their government. I am someone who believes in miracles and it seems to me that it would take a miracle for any son of Kim Jong Il who was entrusted with the office to decide that freedom is better than a life of privilege where one is worshiped as a god. Recent reports of refugees actually returning to North Korea because it was difficult for them to make ends meet in South Korea, and news that the North Korean government is using them for propaganda, lead me to believe that an end to the dictatorship is yet many years ahead.

Let us pray for the people of Korea, that they may again be one, and that they may taste the sweet honey of freedom.

I rate Kimjongilia four out of five stars.

Watch the trailer below.